Hi Meral,

On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:

Hi,
I would support this draft based on its content, but I only see one problem: it does not consider or even refer to draft-ietf-pce-brpc-04.txt (or maybe I
missed it?).
I would rather see a single draft covering all possible optimization
scenarios/solutions based on the PCE architecture.


BRPC is a multi-PCE path computation technique used to compute a shortest constrained inter-domain path wheres this ID specifies a (preferably) NMS based technique where a set of path computation requests are bundled and send to a PCE with the objective of
"optimizing" the set of computed paths.

Having several IDs for optimization applications is ok as long as they refer to each other and maybe provide an <inter-working> section between the different
methods.

There is no real reason for referring to each other since there is no dependency.

Thanks.

JP.


Cordially,
Meral



Selon JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Dear WG,

Do you support the adoption of draft-lee-pce-global-concurrent-
optimization-04.txt as a Working Group document ?

Thanks.

JP.

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce



_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to