[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 7/16/02 4:16:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> <<
> The 7094 did about .35 MIPS (millions of instructions per second), the 360/50 
> about 0.7 MIPS.
> 
> 
> The '50 was slower than that.
> 
> It was the '65 which could do about 0.7 MIPS.
> 

Guess my reference was wrong, I'm not surprised.

I haven't got any direct experience with one (though I did run FORTRAN 
programs on one over 20 years ago...;-)

-- 
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs



-- 
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to