In a message dated 1/2/05 4:41:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>>However, your data is a little off. I think you meant 14.4[M]bps .. I have 
>>the Powerline setup like I mentioned before; the speed is just about the 
same as 
>>802.11b. I know it is nowhere near as slow as 14.4k or even 56k. I am using 
>>it right now in fact; the software it came with is telling me that my speed 
>>RIGHT NOW is 11.4mbps...
>
>I read a product review of it somewhere and that's the figure it gave.
>Maybe this is a later revision or a different brand entirely?
>
>Keep in mind that reported speeds from the OS or the included program is
>the theoretical maximum transfer rate.  For the real speed, you'll need
>to run a bandwidth testing program.  But it's usually pretty close.

Aha... I think I know to what you're referring to now...
I believe you're referring to the Powerline adapter for PHONE RJ-11 
connectors. If I remember, those WERE limited to 14.4kbps. 

But no, I am referring to Ethernet Powerline adapters. And they are at least 
as fast as 802.11b, which is kewl for me since I have a -B wifi network.

>Example, my 802.11b network speed is apparently 22.0 Mbps, but with a 
>USB 1.1-only network adapter on my end, that's reduced to 12 Mbps 
>(between the adapter and my computer).  Plus, with 256-bit WEP and MAC
>filtering enabled and the signal passing through a floor, ceiling and 
>past two CRT monitors, a microwave and a set of speakers, the actual 
>measured transfer rate is closer to 5.5 Mbps.

All of the above may certainly be true... we are all limted by whatever 
equipment we have to work with; busses, cards, etc. But even the worst combo 
would 
not slow down a Powerline Ethernet adapter setup down to 14.4kbps(!).

>>When trying to wifi a 6400/200, I think anything 802.11G and beyond is 
kinda 
>>ruled out. Your answer kinda ignored the fact that the lister has a 
6400/200.
>>What 802.11g device (outside of a $80+ wireless bridge) can allow it to
>>receive a G signal?
>
>Skip right past USB; you'll need a USB 2.0 host to hit Wireless-G 
>speeds, which isn't possible under OS 9.  However, a PCI card should be
>up to the task, but your next mission, should you choose to accept it,
>would be to find a G card that supports OS 9 both in architecture and 
>drivers.  If not, keep looking or consider XPostFacto-ing your computer
>if you're willing.

I don't think they exist. In fact, even most wireless B PCI cards that have 
the circutry built-in (not ones like mine who accept a PC card) work on Beige 
G3s and above only. I think the only way would be to get a Wifi G bridge, and 
they are too expensive for me to consider right now.

The only wireless PCI cards I have found that work in pre-G3 PCI Macs are the 
Skyline 802.11b PCI Carrier cards. 

Craig W.

-- 
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:   <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to