On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Michael McCarty wrote: > I've compiled PCRE 7.8 on Linux and ran pcretest (compiled with NOPOSIX > defined) on the test data. It passes most of the tests without problem, but > it apparently fails on testinput7, 8, and 9 (see attached output files). > > % pcretest -C > PCRE version 7.8 2008-09-05 > Compiled with > UTF-8 support > Unicode properties support > Newline sequence is ANY > \R matches all Unicode newlines > Internal link size = 2 > POSIX malloc threshold = 10 > Default match limit = 10000000 > Default recursion depth limit = 10000000 > Match recursion uses stack > > Are these differences anything I should be concerned about? Any advice is > welcome.
I've taken a look at these, and they suggest to me that you ran the tests in a non-standard way. Did you use the RunTest script? It looks as if you ran tests 7,8, and 9 without the -dfa option because the output shows that it used the normal matching function rather than the DFA matcher. This explains why it did not work as expected. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
