Ya know, it's funny... I revisited this just last Friday and discovered the RunTest script and it (of course) executed without error.
Sorry to waste your time. On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Philip Hazel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Michael McCarty wrote: > > > I've compiled PCRE 7.8 on Linux and ran pcretest (compiled with NOPOSIX > > defined) on the test data. It passes most of the tests without problem, > but > > it apparently fails on testinput7, 8, and 9 (see attached output files). > > > > % pcretest -C > > PCRE version 7.8 2008-09-05 > > Compiled with > > UTF-8 support > > Unicode properties support > > Newline sequence is ANY > > \R matches all Unicode newlines > > Internal link size = 2 > > POSIX malloc threshold = 10 > > Default match limit = 10000000 > > Default recursion depth limit = 10000000 > > Match recursion uses stack > > > > Are these differences anything I should be concerned about? Any advice > is > > welcome. > > I've taken a look at these, and they suggest to me that you ran the > tests in a non-standard way. Did you use the RunTest script? It looks as > if you ran tests 7,8, and 9 without the -dfa option because the output > shows that it used the normal matching function rather than the DFA > matcher. This explains why it did not work as expected. > > Philip > > -- > Philip Hazel > -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
