Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning, am Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2012 um 18:38 schrieben Sie:
> I would really appreciate if some of you could have a look at the > regex and give me some hints about how I could rewrite it to a > functional lookbehind assertion or something similar usable as a > whitelist. Thanks for any ideas! Just to be clear, as I seemed to wrongly mix it: I have a negative lookbehinde assertion and can accomplish my goal with a source code change and a positive lookbehinde assertion, but would prefer something like a negative lookahead assertion, which didn't work for me, or something similar. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:[email protected] AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon.............030-2 1001-310 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
