On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> In case anyone has similar problems: This regexp can be rewritten to a
> valid negative lookbehind assertion if pkcs7 is removed from the
> inner branches and just used as a literal in it's only two
> combinations it's use in the branches shoudl check.
I was about to start thinking about your problem, but you have solved it
yourself first. I do like it when that happens!
Philip
--
Philip Hazel
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
