Hi PhilYou are correct. I do not even have to check. I've changed (with the
intention of improving :-) something in my process between PCRE and PCRE2 and
did not see the implications.regarding POSIX. I am glad I was diligent in the
testings so the bug was discovered early on, in the RC stage.I will now correct
my process and redo the test. Ze'ev Atlas
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ze'ev Atlas <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] A question about testinput18
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016, I wrote:
> To check, please insert a printf() statement into the regcomp() function
> in pcre2posix.c - sorry, I have to dash so I haven't time to make an
> example now. Will do so later if I'm back here before you reply.
Around line 197 of pcre2posix.c:
PCRE2POSIX_EXP_DEFN int PCRE2_CALL_CONVENTION
regcomp(regex_t *preg, const char *pattern, int cflags)
{
PCRE2_SIZE erroffset;
int errorcode;
int options = 0;
int re_nsub = 0;
fprintf(stderr, "+++HERE+++\n"); /* <======== Insert this line */
if ((cflags & REG_ICASE) != 0) options |= PCRE2_CASELESS;
Philip
--
Philip Hazel
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
