On Sun, 3 Jan 2016, Ze'ev Atlas wrote: > Hi PhilYou are correct. I do not even have to check. I've changed > (with the intention of improving :-) something in my process between > PCRE and PCRE2 and did not see the implications.regarding POSIX. I am > glad I was diligent in the testings so the bug was discovered early > on, in the RC stage.I will now correct my process and redo the > test. Ze'ev Atlas
Oh good. I'm glad we have sorted this out. Once 10.21 is released, I will add some code to pcre2test to detect this situation explicitly, and give a suitable message. With that in place, it should be easier to figure out what is happening if this happens again. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
