On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Zoltán Herczeg wrote: > If we consider the following pattern: > /(*napla:a|a)+/ > > is the same as: > /(?:(*napla:a|a))+/ > > Then we have an empty match if I understand correctly the behavior of > this new construct.
Oh, sorry, I was thinking of (*MARK:X)(?:abc(*MOVE:X))+ which is not an empty match. Your example is indeed an empty match. Philip -- Philip Hazel -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
