https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2511
--- Comment #2 from Kilian <kkil...@gmail.com> --- Hi Philip, 1. As the functionality is already there internally and pcre2_substitute_match could be called by pcre2_substitute, the code will be cleaner, more easy to maintain and more modular and thus enable more applications (i.e. mine ;-)). So you will not only loose anything by maintaining the API but actually gaining something. 2. Copying (maybe megabytes) for nothing will not be a good idea for my taste. Could, as a last resort, something along the lines of: https://github.com/cohomology/pcre/commit/fb11ec94e27e99b5cc5e35ff3f8460d10fa3596a be possible? Thanks Kilian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
