2014-09-08 11:19 GMT+02:00 Umberto Rustichelli <[email protected]>: > > OK, tests for millions of signatures were mostly positive for you (you all > in the list up to now) and also for us (things always break in production, > don't you know?). > The main difference is that both my production environment and test > environment work with 14 cards, with 2 USB hubs, 7 cards per hub (not one > card) and I never re-login/reconnect, just go on signing exploiting the > existing PKCS#11 session. > > The only difference between my test and production environment were the > cards (the customer's cards are a bit more recent). > I think that we're going nowhere at the moment (my fault, given that I > cannot provide much debug data), anyway I'll keep listening if anyone can > help... I suppose that if we broaden the suspects pool to include a USB > glitch (excessive power drain that hampers USB communication) we are going > too far...
It may be a temporary hardware issue. But in this case you should not have "apparently every time we restart the cards the time-to-failure gets shorter" Do you have numbers about the "gets shorter"? It is 10%, 50% or 90% shorter? Do you have the problem with different readers from different manufacturers? Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ Pcsclite-muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcsclite-muscle
