On 09/08/2014 12:48 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On 08 Sep 2014, at 12:04, Umberto Rustichelli <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 09/08/2014 11:49 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On 08 Sep 2014, at 11:00, Umberto Rustichelli <[email protected]>
wrote:
First of all, thanks everybody for the prompt help.
Maybe I should first notice that we ran a test with >2 million signatures befre
going into production but with different cards: we could not test the customer's
cards because we don't have them. The family is InCard but cards families are
so... crowded…
Can you extract a bit more detail about the card/ATR/firmware ? We’ve found the
STMicroelectronics cards quite reliable; and Napoli and Catania teams quite
easy to work with when it came to technical issues/bugs.
This is the card ATR. For signature operations, this family of cards seems to
be quite reliable by us, indeed:
3b:ff:18:00:ff:81:31:fe:55:00:6b:02:09:03:03:01:01:01:43:4e:53:10:31:80:9d
Ok - that looks like the sort of Italian Chamber of Commerce/regione
calabria cards we’ve seen - those are STMicro, Incard - and pretty much all we
have handled are on InCrypto34 V2. As far as we know - they use the st19xl34p -
and very similar models are in use in Germany in the medical sector as well.
For what it is worth - we find that we can do, using SPR532 readers, virtually
unlimited signs with these; using a single C_Login/session per power-up.
I agree that unlikely there is an issue with readers, anyway we settled
on Gemalto-branded readers, the look is transparent as in
http://www.gemalto.com/products/usb_shell_token_v2/index.html
and it is recognized as "Gemplus GemPC Key".
_______________________________________________
Pcsclite-muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcsclite-muscle
