[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Clint,
>
> The program has the main use of backing up and restoring long file names.
>
> This goes back to the whole issue, when Win98 was originally released, of
> letting you, for whatever reason, save and restore the long file names of
> files as found in Win98. Since a number of people were going from either
> Win95 or earlier, and were still used to the 8.3 file convention from Dos
> days, they had a problem of how to handle the new long file name format,
> especially with regard to backup and restore programs, but also any number
> of Dos programs, which still used the 8.3 file format.
>
> HOWEVER, the program has a fundamental (and potential fatal to Window's
> operation) flaw when this whole subject is looked at, as I found out for
> myself when I tried to use it.
>
> The issue is the whole subject of how Windows generates the short file
> name, using the ~ convention. Supposed you have 2 files which differ in
> file name quite far in the file name, such as abcdefghij1.xxx and
> abcdefghij2.xxx - if you did a directory listing where the files existed,
> you would find the 8.3 convention would have them listed as abcdef~1.xxx
> and abcdef~2.xxx. HOWEVER, if you moved them in reverse order (that is the
> 2 file before the 1 file) to a different directory, the 8.3 file names
> would end up being reversed in many cases, so now abcdef~1.xxx would be
> abcdefghij2.xxx, and abcdef~2.xxx would be abcdefghij1.xxx. Not a real big
> thing *** IF *** you are using the long file names with the 8.3 file names.
>
> HOWEVER, if you had used the SULNBK.EXE program to save your long file
> names, for later restoring, NOW you got *** BIG TROUBLE ***!!!!! When you
> now run the program to restore your long file names, the long file names
> will be restored based on the ORIGINAL 8.3 file names that were in use when
> the program was run.
>
> In this example case, the result is not major. HOWEVER, if you do a search
> on ANY computer system running a non-NT version of windows using long file
> names (later 95, 98, ME), for file names with ~ in the 7th position of the
> file name, you will find a TON of them existing, and in many cases, you
> will have a number of duplicate names in the first 6 character positions -
> the difference is ONLY in the 8th character position of the name(s). As
> long as the long file names remain intact, this will not be a problem. ***
> BUT *** if you run this program, to save the long file names, with the
> intention of restoring them later, leaving you only with directories and
> files only with the 8.3 file names, the potential for disaster is
> unbelievable.
>
> For example, to see the problems, all you have to do is do a fresh install
> of Win98, run the program to save the long file names, and then re-run to
> restore the names - dont move any files or directories, or delete anything,
> during the whole process.
>
> You get any number of file name problems in both directions - and later the
> more programs you create or install, the worst the problems get. Since many
> of the file names involved are base windows programs, needed for windows to
> operate properly, windows just ends up having problems like you would not
> believe.
>
> I have NO idea WHO at Microsoft, or elsewhere, wrote this program, but it
> is SEVERELY flawed, since it uses ONLY the CURRENT 8.3 file name found when
> the program is run, in either direction, as the basis for saving and
> restoring the long file names of directories and files in windows. MUCH
> more should have been included and used for save and restore criteria, such
> as checksums, dates/times, and any number of other factors, to guarentee
> the right name got saved/restored with the right directory/file.
>
> My personal advice - USE THIS PROGRAM AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!!
>
> Ralph
>

Hi All. Thanks - EVERYONE.. for your help with this file. I got that email.. btw, just 
from
one person. and she was positive it was a vir**.. Otherwise, she'd have never sent me 
that
email. It' wasn't a "mass mailing". it was sent to me.. and to a few other people in 
her
address book.. and when she said, that her husband, deleted it from his computer. as 
well as
hers..(and her husband.. builds computers.).. well, I didnt' even hesitate and I just 
deleted
it.

But that said, I wont' do that EVER AGAIN.. LOL.. from now on. I'll check the site,, 
that
everyone recommends. I just bookmarked it.. and will check it from now on..

Also, as far as using the Windows CD .. I did.. (also  - the system restoration disk). 
and I
couldn't find the file anyplace..

So, Carole was so kind, and sent it to me.. And I do appreciate it. (others sent it to 
me
also. Thank you all)..

It's back, in it's rightful place.. but now.. after reading your email, Ralph.. 
<smile>. you
can be SURE I wont' ever use the file.. LOL.. Actually, I never knew it existed 
before.. so I
guess I never had a need for it. and probably never will..

Thanks again .. to everyone..

Helene
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to