At this *particular* second: 1st check was 2880k, 2nd check (when re-loading it) was 3448k. So guess it's safe to say roughly ~3mb. -Clint
God Bless Us All Clint Hamilton, Owner Want to exchange links with us? http://OrpheusComputing.com � ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Kaulback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Clint do you have a figure for how much memory your NAV consumes? I would be interested in comparing it to other versions I have access to with clients' systems. I know SAV (Symantec Antiv***s) 8, uses about 5.9 - 6.0 mb of memory, from recent work on this client's network. Peter Kaulback In the hour of 03:45 AM 21/01/2003 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke this: >I still use the OLD version '95 of NAV v5.1!! Why? It >consumes FAR LESS resources and memory, it will find the SAME >malicious codes that newer versions will, and I've never had >ANY problems with it AT ALL. I had nothing but problems with >v2000, 2001, 2002; especially with them the 'email scanning' >feature was MOST problematic. I don't see the point of it >since all emails are scanned anyway with 'auto protect'. > >Of course anything running in the BG is going to consume RAM >and resources, and of course when NAV is actively running a >manual scan, it's going to be consuming more. So no, it is >still consuming RAM and resources as long as it is 'active' or >'on'. >-Clint > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "scubic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >At 01:04 PM 01/19/2003 -0800, Ed wrote > >Sandy, I stopped using both Norton and McAfee several years >ago > >because both of them are resource HOGS, especially Norton. > >I use AVG6, (free VERSION) >http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_downl.htm > >It does a good job along with one's prudence and good sense >of not > >opening unknown attachments. > >Of course there's lots of folks that think their system will >self destruct > >it they don't have one of these resource hogs installed. . . > >Ed > >I have Norton Utilities installed--mostly for the times that I >choose to >use CleanSweep and maintenence features. Along with it is >Norton AV, which >I do use to keep my AV updates. However, the only thing I >have running is >Norton Autoprotect to check files. I do NOT have it checking >all my email. > It takes forever and a ton of resources to do that. > >I understand that using Norton in this way, it only uses >resources when >necessary for checking files. Is this correct? > >Sue ============= PCWorks Mailing List ================= Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines & make sure you've followed proper posting procedures, http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com =====================================================
