One large hole in this system is that blocking IP ranges will do more harm
than good.
Think of all the good sites you may be missing in those ranges that you
will never know.
I have never comprehended this logic whereby just because a small number
cause issues that all must be censored.
Which is why I do not put my trust in crude systems like these but rather
in more detailed filters.
It would be nice also if the IP holders in these area's were concerned more
with security and concerns of their customers true identities (many
operations in North America have used these hosts for attacks) than the
almighty dollar but one must make a living too (I still have not seen a
spammer site on a free host :>).
As for the Googlebar I've not had any security issues with it, MSN is
something else.
If anyone using Mozilla or Netscape 7.x is interested there is a Googlebar
for these browsers too, it is wholly unrelated to Google but it is a good
search tool too http://googlebar.mozdev.org/
Peter Kaulback
--
They that can give up liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin 1706 - 1790
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================
- PCWorks: Question on blocking IP's Jeff Dougherty
- RE: PCWorks: Question on blocking IP's Thomas Fisher
- Re: PCWorks: Question on blocking IP... Support-OrpheusComputing.com
- Re: PCWorks: Question on blockin... Peter Kaulback
- Re: PCWorks: Question on blo... Jeff Dougherty
- Re: PCWorks: Question on blo... Support-OrpheusComputing.com
- Re: PCWorks: Question on blocking IP's Support-OrpheusComputing.com
