Clint, this might be of interest to you http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/teredo.mspx

Or it might not, I know one area of the planet that is very IPV6 friendly is Asia and Europe also is picking up speed, and both are over and above the level of North America with deployments.

Do you also have a router with NAT running? Is it IPV6 friendly too?

Keep us updated on this development please.

Peter Kaulback

In the hour of 11:41 AM 7/4/2004, Support-OrpheusComputing.com spoke this:

A few days ago I installed the IPV6 Networking update on XP
Pro.  This updates the Native XP firewall to "6" I believe.  It
installed without a problem, and the Native XP Firewall still
showed enabled (and it still does now).  I went into "Services"
to check out some things, and the original entry for the first
firewall "Internet connection firewall (ICF)" is still running.
There is also the new entry now for "IPV6 Internet connection
firewall" which I cannot start.  Every time I try and start the
service, I get: "Windows could not start the ipv6 internet
connection firewall on local computer" and "refer to error
code 2147014849".  Then it says for more info check the
system event log, of which of course doesn't have JACK
about it!  All it states is "The IPv6 Internet Connection
Firewall service was unable to find support for IPv6.  This
may indicate that the IPv6 protocol suite is not installed
or it failed to start. The data is the error code" and it is
"Event 32005", and when you click the link for more
info, it has NONE.  ALL of the dependencies for IPV6 ARE
RUNNING, so there's no reason why it shouldn't start.
Of course I can't find any info on these phrases or events
at any search engine.  So, I'm wondering what the problem
may be and why I cannot enable it.
-Clint
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to