On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be
the best thing to vectorize, but there are definitely vectorizable
loops in Pd.
perhaps it would be a good start to reimplement newbytes(n) using
memalign(16,n) instead of malloc(n).
Submit a patch to the tracker and we can try it out on the Pd-
extended auto-builds. Does memalign() exist in Windows land?
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
