Am 19.11.2006 um 05:00 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
On Nov 18, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Am 18.11.2006 um 22:16 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not
be the best thing to vectorize, but there are definitely
vectorizable loops in Pd.
perhaps it would be a good start to reimplement newbytes(n) using
memalign(16,n) instead of malloc(n).
A few years ago i introduced aligned memory allocation in the pd-
devel branch.
Have you tried submitting a patch? It would be at least useful in
Pd-extended. How big a difference did it make?
I have a better idea. People interested in improvements can easily
make a diff from the devel branch.
The aligned memory allocation is part of the SIMD codelets which have
been part of pd-devel for a long time.
best greetings,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
