On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 11:50:00AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Chris McCormick wrote: > > 1. IEM? (is this an option?) > > pros: > > cons: lots of work for IOhannes. > > > > 2. savanna.nongnu.org > > pros: > > cons: > > > > 3. Rent a dedicated server. > > pros: we have total control. > > cons: we have to install and set up. costs money. > > > > i do not fully understand the difference between 1. and 3. > we could rent a dedicated server at the IEM :-)
We can? Ok. If we rent, we would need to evaluate the different options for price, features, etc. I was under the impression that the IEM option was IEM donating server resources with yourself doing the administration. > as for savanna: how is this different from just staying at sourceforge? We know the SF sucks. Do we have evidence that Savanna sucks? Let's add an option: 4. Stay at sourceforge but transition to SVN. pros: easy. cons: SF sucks. Best, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
