On Jul 9, 2007, at 1:44 AM, Chris McCormick wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:33:56PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner > wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2007, at 6:02 AM, Chris McCormick wrote: >>> Sounds good! I will stop pestering the list about it then and wait >>> until >>> after pd~convention to commit s-abstractions when there is some >>> resolution about the repository. >> >> It doesn't take much to commit stuff to the CVS. I'd say it wouldn't >> hurt to do it now. > > Well as it stands now I'd have the annoying requirement that I keep > two local copies of s-abstractions and have to manually port changes > between them and commit to two different repositories, which was the > reason for my original post. I am very forgetful, and I am certain > that > the SF repository would fall out of date as I'd forget to commit to > that > repository each time I made a change. > > I'm happy to wait until we've resolved the repository issues before > importing my abstractions.
If you are going to maintain your code in a repository that is different from the pure-data one, then it makes the most sense to only import releases into the pure-data CVS, instead of keeping it synced. "cvs import" allows you to do this with one command that also makes a tag for that release. .hc > > Best, > > Chris. > > ------------------- > http://mccormick.cx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- "...information-sharing is a powerful positive good, and... it is an ethical duty of hackers to share their expertise by writing open- source code and facilitating access to information and to computing resources wherever possible." - Eric Raymond _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
