Hi On 10 Feb 2008, at 22:58, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> And if so, what's the appropriate branch? branches/pd? branches / >> pd / >> pd-0.40-3? > > I'd say, that as we now have no ACL anymore, care should be taken when > working on the Pd sources itself. So far, Miller had his own section > that was read-only for others. I think, as the mechanism to protect > Miller's part is gone now, we need a policy instead how to achieve a > similar kind of protection, and we probably need it soon. My > suggestion would be to agree that only Miller commits to the "trunk" > of "pd" and to create some similarily protected area for Miller's > release branches. I don't have a problem with the pumpkin holder approach at all (which is why I didn't just commit this to trunk) I would like to see tiny (but important) patches go to latest unprotected branch, wherefrom miller can just cherry pick changes from branches to trunk, so: [someDeveloper]: svn checkout branches/buggyBranch [edits s_inter.c] svn commit -m "I fixed bug 37654" revision 20 [miller]: svn diff -rHEAD s_inter.c [oooh yummy change] svn merge -r 20:HEAD svn://puredata/branches/buggyBranch [slurp] In the meantime, what branch do people think bugfixes like this one should go into? David _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
