Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Ah, how is that something that SF has to setup themselves?... I have > never been admin on a SF.net project, so, I don't know, but wouldn't > that only be about whether a web interface is available for handling the > ACL ?
basically yes. What's the SVN equivalent of the CVSROOT directory? but in practice no. there is no CVSROOT equivalent in subversion. subversion itself does no nothing about authentication and authorisation: this is left for a frontend. the usual frontend (the one sourceforge is using) is via http/webdav; an ACL needs to made available to the frontend; for apache, this is usually done via a special file on the filesystem (which is read by the apache-server); more info under [1]. sourceforge would need to provide a means to write this special file; in my privat svn-setups, i haven't found a way to split this configuration into a per-repository file (instead of per-webserver) - but that might be just my personal failure; this might be the reason why sourceforge does not provide any means of ACLs for svn (yet). fmgasd,r IOhannes [1] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.serverconfig.httpd.html#svn.serverconfig.httpd.authz (btw, i think the svnbook is a good read anyhow) _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
