Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto: > Hey, > > Now that we have a number of loaders, I'd like to figure out a > standard way of naming the libraries so that they are easy to > organize and load. Currently, there are these arrangments: > > pdXXX > ----- > pdlua.pd_linux > pdtcl.pd_linux > pdhaskell.pd_linux > [import pdtcl] > > > XXXpd > ----- > luapd.pd_linux > tclpd.pd_linux > haskellpd.pd_linux > [import tclpd] > > > XXX > --- > lua.pd_linux > tcl.pd_linux > haskell.pd_linux > [import tcl] > >
for me it's ok either "tclpd" or "pdtcl". I believe calling it just "tcl" would lead to confusion, since Tcl is already a library used by Pd. if you happen to rename tclpd to pdtcl, please rename also the occurrences of tclpd inside the source code to pdtcl. -- Federico Ferri _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
