Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is if > it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining new atoms > types. Can anyone speak to that?
does the patch still register the "string" keyword? (and in doing so breaks all other objects that use [string( without the string-atomtype?) fmsdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
