IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> I am fine with leaving the string patch in this release as it is if >> it will be compatible with a generic approach to defining new atoms >> types. Can anyone speak to that? > > does the patch still register the "string" keyword? (and in doing so > breaks all other objects that use [string( without the string-atomtype?) >
The latest version registers the "blob" keyword instead, but I think it is not necessary for it to register a name at all. Martin _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
