OK, I submitted a tight little patch<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1948146&group_id=55736&atid=478072>to patch tracker containing only as few changes as necessary.
I suggest that admin deletes the patches I submitted before with request IDs 1943614 and 1943301. I believe the latest patch is bugfree as I have already tested the code a lot and fixed every problem I stumbled upon. Try it out yourself. Kindest regards, J. On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To start with, I think you should get a nice tight patch for switching > garrays to using 'move' so we can see if this is really worth pursuing and > what problems in might cause. > > Please keep on experimenting with all things. But just so you know, if > you want to get these patches included into pd-vanilla or pd-extended, they > either need to be small or really well tested. So completely reworking > garrays is probably something better attempting after we know that this > core idea works out well (using move instead of delete/create). > > .hc > >
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
