In the future, keep on posting to the same patch number in the patch
tracker, rather then opening new patches for each chance. It makes
it much easier to follow that way. I closed the duplicates.
I'll take a look when I can. But first I want to get the 0.40
release out ASAP, then we can all focus on making 0.41 better.
.hc
On Apr 21, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Jakob Leben wrote:
OK, I submitted a tight little patch to patch tracker containing
only as few changes as necessary.
I suggest that admin deletes the patches I submitted before with
request IDs 1943614 and 1943301.
I believe the latest patch is bugfree as I have already tested the
code a lot and fixed every problem I stumbled upon. Try it out
yourself.
Kindest regards,
J.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To start with, I think you should get a nice tight patch for
switching garrays to using 'move' so we can see if this is really
worth pursuing and what problems in might cause.
Please keep on experimenting with all things. But just so you
know, if you want to get these patches included into pd-vanilla or
pd-extended, they either need to be small or really well tested.
So completely reworking garrays is probably something better
attempting after we know that this core idea works out well (using
move instead of delete/create).
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
