hello, Tim Blechmann a écrit : >> So, i'd like to know it i'm to much optimistic, or if work on thread >> with pd will be obsolet when pd 0.42 will be out. > > i didn't check the sources, but from the description in miller's icmc > paper, does anyone know where to fine this article?
>pd~ introduces a pipelined approach, i.e. adding one block of > latency when audio data is passed from one thread to another. > from my understanding, the pd~ approach is static, so a patch would need > to be written explicitly for the number of threads ... well, if you can make an threaded_soudfiler abstraction based on pd~ and soundfiler, then it should be ok... > > pd~ has different limitations than max5's poly~, but is still far away > from a general solution ... ok thanks Cyrille > > tim > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
