On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd like to read that ICMC paper, is sucks that ICMC is so lame > about publishing their papers. They are really difficult to get, > even though I have access to two academic libraries (NYU and Brooklyn > Polytechnic) and the NYPL, one of the world's largest. So for people > outside of computer music academia, papers in ICMC are as close to > good as not published at all. ICMC should follow the example of > conferences like NIME (http://nime.org/ ), where all of the papers > are available online and are freely downloadable. I agree wholeheartedly. I'm actually trying to decide right now whether to publish something at ICMC or at NIME, and this makes the decision a lot tougher. (Specifically because my university is hosting ICMC next year, so it would make more sense for me, but on the other hand I want the paper made available.) Fortunately many people are just posting up their papers on their own websites, maybe Miller could do this. However, I suggest everyone who this bothers to email the admin for ICMC 2008, and ask for a copy of the paper: http://www.icmc2008.net/contact Steve _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
