Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > > Getting rid of cyclone's pow~ would break all of the patches that rely > > on cyclone's pow~, and would also make it harder to import Max/MSP > > patches. Removing it is not a solution. > > Okay. But I don't see why something that is a rather obvious breach > of style should be allowed to bully the rest of the application. I > have never used Max/MSP, but it seems like its (and cyclone's) [pow~] > is really something more like an [exp~] with a changeable base.
Cyclone's overriding is pretty important for importing Max files. Without it I wouldn't have been able to port the RTC library that fast. Of course porting RTC involved replacing many objects with their Pd equivalents (and being a pd-vanilla fanboy, I mostly used builtins and abstractions for that). Other users may be fine with keeping Cyclone loaded and run the Max originals - freedom of choice is fine here. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
