On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 07:30 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
>
> > > Getting rid of cyclone's pow~ would break all of the patches that rely
> > > on cyclone's pow~, and would also make it harder to import Max/MSP
> > > patches. Removing it is not a solution.
> >
> > Okay. But I don't see why something that is a rather obvious breach
> > of style should be allowed to bully the rest of the application. I
> > have never used Max/MSP, but it seems like its (and cyclone's) [pow~]
> > is really something more like an [exp~] with a changeable base.
>
> Cyclone's overriding is pretty important for importing Max files.
> Without it I wouldn't have been able to port the RTC library that fast.
now, that pd has its own [pow~], why not just using that? yeah, it takes
a bit more time to write the abstractions, but then they are more
vanilla friendly.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
