On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > ola, >> >> >>> To be clear, the libraries will all still be included in the >>> package, they > just won't be loaded by default. That means you'll have load them > as part of > the patch using either [declare] or [import], or using namespace > prefixes like > [cyclone/prepend]. This puts us further towards the goal of having > all of the > patch settings stored in the patch itself, making it more likely to > work on > more computers. >>> > > computers? we speak of toasters here... > i'm really annoyed that you speak from you dev point of view > and don't see how many people will ask themselves : > where the heck is that object?? > not even having a chance to discover it by accident... > and accidents make the greatest stories... > > more seriously, in your 'scientific' language, > it's just sucks... ( that's real science ) > > and you don't explain why you turned unauthorized into a lib, > there was absolutely no reason for that > > and also i see no progress in pd since 2 years, > until it will get a real threaded gui > and soundfile loader ( patches i did in 2002 ), > well hey? i totally disagree with darwin, > evolution is bad
If the language is an impediment, I would love to hear suggestions for how to improve it. The last thing I want to do if force Pd into the land of computer science. "namespace" seems like a pretty clear name to me, but I am not married to it. .hc > > > xiaoo, > sevy > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
