On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I have found in my teaching that [trigger] is a fair more complex thing
to understand than import. [trigger] has to be explained at length,
often repeatly.
How much of it is because of the inherent complexity of [trigger], vs how
much is because of how it ties in with execution order, the hot/cold
inlets and the standard outlet order (right-to-left) ?
And then how much of the rest of trigger can be explained in terms of
other things that may be already known? For example, [t b] is like a [t a]
with a [bang].
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
