On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:21 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Martin Peach wrote:
> >
> > Well isn't it just easier to use something with a different name? If you
> > have a backwards [pow] why not just call it [backwardspow] instead of
> > letting users guess which [pow] is the right one?
>
> who would object to that?
>
> but which [pow~] _is_ the right one, and which one is backward?
this is so much a rhethoric question, which is practically so easy to
answer and was already answered. i absolutely don't see the point of
this question.
i think, that the question, why a new object [pack] is named pack is not
rhetoric at all and isn't answered yet. so lets go again: why is [pack]
from zexy called [pack]?
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
