Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote: > >> Well isn't it just easier to use something with a different name? If you >> have a backwards [pow] why not just call it [backwardspow] instead of >> letting users guess which [pow] is the right one? > > If a former external becomes a builtin in some future Pd version, you > cannot use something with a different name, you can only rename the > old external to something else. And what if the new builtin name was > used by different, conflicting classes? What if Pd gets a [counter] > builtin as is sometimes requested? >
I suggest that the first object to use the name 'owns' the name and any subsequently invented objects use different names. That's all. If there's already a [counter] then Pd's new builtin counter would have to be called [pdcounter] or something. The name doesn't affect the function, and usually is not much use beyond being a unique identifier. You still need to look at the help patch to know what any version of [counter] actually does. Martin _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
