that's true, after making the question I thought that mainly the most hardcore guys stick to pd-van, because it's easier for them to adapt it to their needs, and there's more tradition with self-programming (enhancing the core package). but I would dare say that for many non-developper-users, pd-ext is much more used than pd-van. pd-ext is a couple of decimals behind pd-van (and the windows version even more, as the disk for it is out of order since last summer), but HC doesn't have a grant to work on pd-ext.
> yep, when you need to compile some stuff, pd-extended is not really made > for you. > since i quite often have to use a very recent Gem version for my > project, (specially when i correct some Gem bugs when working on this > project), i must recompile Gem on the target machine, so using extended > is not really easy. > using extended is ok when installing a project i made about 1 year ago... _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
