On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:38 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: >> Hallo, >> cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote: >>> this is what i was thinking for the last 5 year. i don't say that >>> this >>> will never change. anyway, i really appreciate the work made on >>> pd-extended, but it is not ready for me yet. i know that my >>> position >>> is a bit extreme, but i don't really have problem with it. >> I have a similar position. :) >> To me the problem of Pd-extended or the reason why I don't use it is >> because it is not only a collection of externals and abstractions, >> but >> it also bundles it with a modified, often out-of-date version of Pd >> into a big monolithic package. > > > i guess one of the main reasons for us (the iem) to not use pd- > extended is, that it is targeted at people without compilers, > whereas we often develop libraries for our projects. > (Pd-extended is severely limited in this respect, e.g. the 103MB > disk image on OSX comes without g_canvas.h)
It would be easy enough to add the headers to the package, feel free to do so. I just assumed that people use the code from SVN since I think that's easier. .hc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
