On Feb 27, 2009, at 5:52 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > João Pais wrote: >> >> exactly. in the contrary of the before mentioned libraries, these >> are more >> groups of externals compassing different groups: glue, math, >> matrix, ... > > please someone explain to me the differences. > > this sounds all very nice on a piece of paper, but to which category > does [pix_sig2pix~] belong to? > - image (or even graphics, since i think that any segregation between > graphics and images should _not_ be done anyhow) > - signal > - glue > - misc > > mfga.sdr > IOhannes
I don't think we should try to come up with an hierarchy in which everything can fit. pix_sig2pix~ can stay in Gem for now. This should be the standard libs of common things, which is currently split across libs like vanilla, zexy, list-abs, creb, etc. .hc ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
