On 30/09/2009, at 9.46, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

hi again

Steffen Juul wrote:

On 29/09/2009, at 23.45, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:

IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
would not. seems you are right at the problematic version :-)

meaning that "you do seem to have a problematic version of autoconf",

Yes, i got it. thanks for investigating, IOhannes!

btw, on a non fink contaminated machine running 10.4 i have autoconf
2.61 installed which can process the configure.ac fine.

Ok. I guess i shouldn't have updated autoconf then. Thanks for testing.


It gets rid of error, but make still says:

$ make
make -C po all
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `.msg', needed by `all'.  Stop.
make: *** [locales] Error 2


these errors are (i think) unrelated to which version of msgfmt you have
installed.
in fact, it seems that make fails to properly expand it's build targets,
and thus never calling msgfmt.

I was thinking some thing along those lines, but don't read makefiles all that well (only basics).

some general hints:

This is great. General hints for debugging is very dandy. Im currently updating the gettext tools to see if that in fact does the trick.

- are you sure that you are at least at revision 12459 of the
branches/pd-gui-rewrite/0.43/ ?

I'm now at revision 12498 which i presume is the latest at of writing.

- did you do any modifications to the Makefile(s)?

Not other then what you suggested in commenting out those lines in configure.ac.

- does it work if you do this?
 % cd po
 % make en_ca.msg

Yes.

$ make en_ca.msg
msgfmt --check --tcl --locale=en_ca -d . en_ca.po

- do you have a crooked version of make?

I don't know, i have:

$ make --version
GNU Make 3.80
Copyright (C) 2002  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

$ which make
/usr/bin/make


_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to