How stable are the opencv objects? Do you think the API will still
change? It would be nice to have them included in Pd-extended, but
doing it too soon creates a lot of annoying work.
.hc
On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:57 AM, [email protected] wrote:
pdp_opencv and pix_opencv have the autotools working
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
So far I've been working on an autotools build system for pd
itself, not libraries. I haven't used autotools in libraries, so I
don't really know what a template would look like. I guess
pdvjtools would be a good library to test out those ideas.
.hc
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, dmotd wrote:
hans,
as an aside, what progress are you
making on an automake template, do you
have something that could be easily
reapplied to various situations for pd
libs?
there seem to be a few strategies, the
iem builders (iem16/iemmatrix/zexy) for
one, bryan jurish's moocow builders and
a set made by tim blechmann (used with
flext).
i still need to spend some time with the
docs before i get into autotools
propper. and any info would be useful.
cheers,
dmotd
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programs should be written for people to read, and only
incidentally for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free
software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls
you." - Richard M. Stallman
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
