I'm not likely to use them in a project any time soon, but with this Mac OS X release, I can give them to my students who are playing with computer vision.

About stability, I mostly mean the API rather than crashing, etc.

.hc

On Oct 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, [email protected] wrote:

after the one week workshop,
i can say they are very stable,
maybe still a few problems on OSX,
as we don't test so much there,
maybe you could help?

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

How stable are the opencv objects? Do you think the API will still change? It would be nice to have them included in Pd-extended, but doing it too soon creates a lot of annoying work.

.hc

On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:57 AM, [email protected] wrote:

pdp_opencv and pix_opencv have the autotools working


Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

So far I've been working on an autotools build system for pd itself, not libraries. I haven't used autotools in libraries, so I don't really know what a template would look like. I guess pdvjtools would be a good library to test out those ideas.

.hc

On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, dmotd wrote:

hans,

as an aside, what progress are you
making on an automake template, do you
have something that could be easily
reapplied to various situations for pd
libs?

there seem to be a few strategies, the
iem builders (iem16/iemmatrix/zexy) for
one, bryan jurish's moocow builders and
a set made by tim blechmann (used with
flext).

i still need to spend some time with the
docs before i get into autotools
propper. and any info would be useful.

cheers,
dmotd





----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs


_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev








----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev








----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.
 - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs


_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to