-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-11-10 18:21, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2011-11-10 17:57, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> >>>> That is 'make install' doing that, not 'make'. 'make install' is only >>>> supposed to install the files, not generate them. >> >> indeed. >> "make" generated the .d_fat files, and "make install" copied them to >> location i pointed you too, so you can see that the files have been >> generated. > > There are no .d_fat files here: > https://160.79.59.149:8443/job/pure-data/all=macosx105/ws/extra/ > > or here: > > https://160.79.59.149:8443/job/pure-data/all=macosx105/ws/extra/bonk~/
https://160.79.59.149:8443/job/pure-data/all=macosx105/ws/extra/bonk~/.libs/ > > Only pd~.d_fat gets generated by 'make'. Shall I file a bug report? > > >>> And it should really use .pd_darwin. There is no reason to have multiple >>> file endings in Mac OS X, the universal file format handles that. >> >> indeed there is no reason, hence i use .d_fat which i think has been the >> default for Pd for years. > > Currently the only thing that is released as .d_fat is the Pd vanilla extra > files. Everything else uses .pd_darwin, even Gem ;) > the build system was done for Pd-vanilla, therefore the extension used by Pd vanilla was chosen. i usually try to avoid smuggling ideological things into the code base by means of a side-effect of another patch. fgamsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk68CjMACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTVVQCfQPIyEsiDM5OcMfWv+kTN6QwL Qg4AoJIIP3+cCUcf44rhdXV1bC+stRAf =Z0kU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
