-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-22 17:10, Martin Peach wrote: > There is already a t_int in Pd, it just isn't used.
the "t_int" type *is* used quite a lot: it is the type to be passed and returned tp/from the DSP perform callback. i'm not sure whether using it as a 32bnit integer is actually "abuse". fgmdsr IOhannes (i totally agree that "t_int" is a horrid name for that type; it really should is a (void*) type and should have a proper name; but there you go). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6uLzAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4ETsP/R6Z+QU0klXIJ90aBKFD9YEA VYm6drloo+/2xWChujJFr31psuQmWoTlVAJ+sAPDkTuCiJ7gB/tiRdT22xifO0iH 6geH9GxcCyzjqW4sDyw8KrF3sWxj43QO4I7xJ2+o4sP4ud1hwzLG7w+Ofb9H8OdU oimP7p0UCaIWF4NNKEljMMo36xoIKVmbvgcXaA2AyROvWp74FuQ5xcfPCwoWFV7d ek9DFIrB7yYsjjzfw0M0w6awPyG96Hj18r0BVnK5sfmNWEZAKMgXxEMuilB7UpAm ueEjQ5Yoa4OTFoNFH104PS1UwEqrJEBtcRcAiInrmu4cHZWuP/QrCoX06ZjK7ASF cyMBgjCwxgxPGijOLpINE4jElO9SDtlTU1PuC8bYHULm0wHe696E8Lw5QqZuFS6I fQLleMaf33XFbnScps/N0DlEE45cj0d7QR3o/reyRfPX2jh9pn/5b65yZIToz9f7 PTsdVu5Sc9uGek2iATl3gm3/B9PNII7Kge3Kqp0yErFoj//PcHTpvFM9KlJfU3T/ juvvoQRTmfdVdO1P8LLY92KWnL5p5HMt0M2j9Eh/F2P94kZK5S3Mc0vYgyJ09xCa jXjKvxFJq/mUELD40rXDpf3uI3BowGFb+6qm0QobvGk3L/eHT9JKdrh00i5B2mS2 cWocMRt9GX2YV2knmoT8 =ZjJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
