-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-22 15:52, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-dev wrote: > Hi Benoit,What do you mean by "64 bits version"? Do you that mean > that you could get your protocol to work on Pd Double, the version > of Pd that uses 64-bit floating point numbers? If so that's > probably the way to go-- and keep in mind that Pd Double can run on > 32-bit architectures, so that isn't a problem.
in practice it might well be: if your CPU only has instructions for single precision math, then using double precision (while technically possible) might have dysmal performance, making a double-precision Pd unusable on these platforms. (we had a similar problem with 1st generation handheld devices, such as PDAs, that would only have fixed point arithmetics. in order to actually run Pd on those devices we needed PDa, a fixed-point fork of Pd) fgnsd IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6uP0AAoJELZQGcR/ejb4WKAP/iGQ/wC4a/6hvC6P6k5jyein 2FW8byZt06RVOqpo/9eX9wAgPtFcreXTNwOLUFTLWWwc23jPUDIo+vuXrHJ24uGK Zq8Rfyt6CthCeiiZYzgfEWwPbe6ojiYIdFCTU5nKifTh8qAU7J5SEhPHnVPKg8W7 /3z0DKxNt2FpRvasWPEOKCIwzBNoeebNKTobB3wfctglK1V7GTxdj/gOU3S8rOkf SuJLbhOgYaQ5HVwKfaXJ7LwfwzZWSyIUZ0ocj3Io9eoTE7PTNV0NqMHCoxUl7Nkt rlEkqnz9xoMjQMpRSgi9BVMatPbZpseCjIYjfE/NvjcFJon/YrDdMhusNmVDUoxh btsgwyKoW2cO7IR2Nh6ofovo8r+kCaDYBPtS5INLokWJiVHjabDbGJJoYl+eq5db XburVIfvXs5xa5fnD5MLm+Vy2vNRCsXmi9T2ceAKdMnJ5Dm/1M0dk9UUxXaygu3y ZLfj9W/m7/+GrHCGWhuLUv7Q6nIS1n+aMGmidYgpd43iA2HLki7GnZuyUYzqysv1 q7CHwj88pxoRw7UVvA4NAlBNG8l9FCV3eK49NPN7cS/+3d6L1LIhxo3j4ixbe0l4 Wtt/greHsIqFeh9gyQyjPIOBchJi0+ytG40JmpIjBwehGMSoR5UnIfHDP2u0XxXG 5ya9FKmHyF/QmZMIBIVp =/Ajg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
