On 2015-11-09 02:56 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > hi hans, > > great to hear from you! > > On 2015-11-09 14:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> FYI, for anyone interested, it would not be hard to do a Pd-extended update >> if it is just a matter of updating the libraries. > > what i would find more interesting: how hard would it be to update the > PdX-core to Pd-0.47? that is, the patcheset against Pd-vanilla. > > i once had a look at the PdX repository (which is based on miller's > vanilla Pd), but even for PdX-0.43 the two repositories had diverged by > (iirc) a few hundred commits, which makes it highly impractical to > rebase/reapply/cherry-pick. > > is there any meta-description available of the diffs between PdX and Pd?
Some time ago I found and isolated a patch for the three pixel inlets and outlets, but it would be nice to have similar patches for other PdX features. > > fgmadsr > IOhannes > Greetings, Fred Jan _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
