On 11/09/2015 08:44 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> For a long time, I used a git workflow that kept the Pd-extended changes as a 
> set of patches on top of vanilla, you can see that in the 'patch_series' 
> branch.  You can see that in the history.  I ultimately abandoned that 
> because there were too many commits from vanilla that I had to remove in 
> order to keep things working.  So I switched to treating vanilla as a source 
> of patches which I included into the pd-extended master.  I regularly 
> submitted patches that didn't rely on the Pd-extended stuff to the patch 
> tracker.  Many of those were ignored for years.  I have no idea the current 
> state of them.
[...]

thanks for clarification.

gmadsr
IOhannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to