Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.
> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> (Sending again, in thread) >> >> Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of >> forward-back-porting? > > this doesn't really matter. > Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might > have been distributed under that license. > > having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number > of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
