Question posted: https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46 <https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46>
> On Aug 21, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would > agree to the port. > > >> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at >> <mailto:pd-dev-requ...@lists.iem.at> wrote: >> >> On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote: >>> (Sending again, in thread) >>> >>> Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of >>> forward-back-porting? >> >> this doesn't really matter. >> Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might >> have been distributed under that license. >> >> having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number >> of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
