On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 14:39 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > What feels sane for me is creating a new object, with a different > name (fluidsynth~) and its own design that is cleaner and doesn't try > to fix this compatibility issues, cause it's just a nightmare with no > simple solution. I like the idea of making it more compatible to Pd > Vanilla and take messages in a more straightforward way from its > internals, and I could do that by having that as a default and just > removing the "legacy" stuff. That would make it all much cleaner... > > Anyway, that's how I'm leaning now... what do you people think?
Sounds good to me. Just to be sure, to old [fluid~] goes to: https://github.com/porres/pd-fluid and the new [fluidsynth~] to: https://github.com/porres/pd-fluidsynth Right? Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
